This week, the DA in Manhattan dismissed all criminal charges against Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the head of the IMF and French politician who enjoyed international notoriety when he was arrested this May on an Air France jet for allegedly sexually assaulting a Manhattan hotel housekeeper.
The decision to dismiss the charges comes as no surprise. Glaring credibility problems with the complaining witness – among them – she has brought phony rape charges in the past – took the wind out of the sales of the prosecution. But what does strike me is the DA’s explanation. The Manhattan DA emphasized its office policy of not trying a case unless the district attorney him or herself is convinced of the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Not all district attorney’s offices practice this policy. By law, they don’t have to. They need only show probable cause in order to hold someone over for a felony. But, if you were the district attorney, would you want to prosecute someone when you weren’t convinced of their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt?
The much-awaited case In re Humphrey was decided last week by the California Supreme Court.…
Effective as law on January 1 of 2021, California Assembly Bill 1950 places strict limits…
I recently learned that a friend who is African-American has been detained by the police…
A routine question I ask my new clients is whether they’ve ever been convicted of…
Check out the National Registry of Exonerations. This database, which is jointly sponsored by the…
To be guilty of murder, don’t you have to kill someone? You would think. After…